Which of the following is NOT a benefit of peer feedback in marksmanship training?

In marksmanship training, peer feedback serves several important purposes that enhance the learning experience for soldiers. The option indicating that peer feedback reduces the need for professional oversight is not considered a benefit because it overlooks the essential role that qualified instructors play in ensuring proper training and safety standards are met.

Professional oversight is critical in marksmanship, as it provides experienced guidance that is necessary for correcting mistakes, ensuring adherence to safety protocols, and teaching advanced techniques. Peer feedback is valuable, but it should complement rather than replace the necessary supervision by professionals. Therefore, while peer feedback can encourage camaraderie, identify areas for improvement, and reinforce correct techniques, it does not diminish the importance of involving qualified instructors in the training process.